There is a small campaign in Australia to defund daycare and give the money to mothers instead. One of the arguments is, “Have you seen the calibre of people working in daycare?”
Putting aside the rights and wrongs and practicalities of the argument, this should be a jarring comment for anyone making decisions about early childhood development. Especially the government. Because it’s becoming an increasingly huge issue.
As a society that is increasingly moving towards institutionalised care, either in the early years, or in later life, we need to understand what can make these institutions places that can offer a genuinely rich and rewarding experience to the ‘user’. However, often, the user is not the one paying for it. Rather, it is usually a child or someone who is suffering from dementia or who has SEND. Put simply, the user is usually vulnerable and voiceless. They can’t produce anything marketable, saleable or profitable. So society’s resources are not directed towards them.
As we have seen in the past week, when resources are directed in this way, the results can be outstanding. Princess Kate visited the municipality of Reggio Emilia, which allocates a significant share of its budget to its world-renowned early years centres. While settings around the world try to copy the ‘idea’, the reality is that this is a research-based pedagogy organised by serious PhD-level professionals. As it should be. It’s not just putting out a few ‘loose parts’ and letting the children get on with it. The Reggio Emilia is a long-term educational project. It is funded as such, and the staff levels are the stuff of fantasy for most of us. It is a project based on collaboration, strong leadership and high investment. It is never, ever, referred to as ‘childcare’, although, happily, it does enable parents to go to work. This is a genuine service FOR the children, not for the parents, although they benefit from it.
In the UK, the system increasingly drives high-calibre people away. This starts at school. Those who are seen as not very academic are given two career options: hair or care. Why? We KNOW that children do better when parents are educated, and this is true for those who work in early years settings. We need intelligence, education, and the ability to think and research. What we don’t need is basic supervision, unquestioning compliance and a lack of pedagogical curiosity.
The reality is that many experienced, intelligent, passionate people are leaving the sector — and fewer ambitious young people are choosing to enter it. Those who do can secure roles with wealthy families and earn money that most graduates can only dream of. And rightly so. This work is important and involves understanding child development, education and psychology. It is literally shaping brains.
Whether ECEC is provided by the state or privately, it cannot be run cheaply, and must not be run by lots of young staff on minimum wage who don’t really truly understand early childhood. The government is FORCING this situation onto children by underpaying so disastrously. It is calculating ratios to someone earning minimum wage, not someone who is a graduate with ten years of professional training and development.
However, another issue needs to be addressed.
Some settings genuinely are poor quality. Not because early years care is inherently flawed, but because parts of the sector have become excessively transactional and financially extractive. Some providers pay the absolute minimum they can get away with, operate with relentless staff turnover, keep staffing levels permanently stretched and reduce the experience to little more than supervision, containment and getting the ‘jobs’ done.
These problems have bled into the sector as a whole because it has become cultural. Children may be safe and fed, but that is not the same thing as receiving rich early education and care.
These settings damage the entire sector’s reputation. They reinforce the idea that childcare is low-skilled work, making it harder for excellent settings to argue for proper investment and professional recognition. Worse still, when governments see childcare primarily as a low-cost labour-market support system, policy becomes increasingly focused on delivering places as cheaply as possible, rather than on creating environments in which children and educators can truly thrive.
This creates a race to the bottom.
Good providers are then forced to compete against models built on low wages, minimal training, exhausted staff and high child volumes. The result is predictable: talented educators leave, standards become inconsistent, and governments respond with yet more compliance and monitoring systems that often burden the best settings while doing little to transform the weakest.
The solution is not simply “more childcare” or “cheaper childcare”. Nor is it endless bureaucracy. It is to recognise early childhood education as a genuine professional field deserving of serious intellectual, financial and cultural investment.
That means:
- better funding linked to quality and staff qualifications
- graduate-led practice
- proper career progression
- stronger pedagogical training
- leadership development
- inspection systems focused on children’s lived experience, not paperwork
- and a cultural shift away from viewing nurseries as warehouses enabling adult productivity.
If society wants intelligent, emotionally literate, thoughtful adults in the future, it must first value the people helping to build them in the earliest years of life. The focus should not be on ‘free’ for the parent, it should be on ‘experience’ for the child.
Failing at work to win at motherhood
Recently, a GP in England was suspended for five months after falsifying patient appointments so she could leave on time to pick up her children. Dr Helen Eisenhauer, a mother of two working in Nottingham, had already seen the patients by phone earlier in the day but...
A Year of Voices, Visibility, and Change: What We’ve Achieved Together
As this year comes to a close, we wanted to take a moment to reflect on what we’ve achieved as a campaign and more importantly, ‘why’ we’re here in the first place. Free Childcare UK was created out of necessity. Not as a political slogan or a headline-grabbing...
The Hidden Costs of Childcare: What Government Funding Doesn’t Cover
The UK government funds early years childcare through the Early Years National Funding Formula (EYNFF), which sets hourly funding rates paid to local authorities and then passed to nurseries. These rates vary by age group and area, and they are often presented as the...
When Safeguarding Fails: What the Nursery Most Recent Abuse Scandal Reveals About Our Early Years System
The recent revelations about a sexual predator operating within English nurseries have shaken the early years sector and the wider public. Cases like this are shocking not only because of the profound harm caused to vulnerable children, but because they expose a...
Thinking of Reporting a Childcare Setting to Ofsted? What Parents Should Know First
In early years, everyone - parents, practitioners, managers, and Ofsted - share the same priority: children’s safety, happiness, and wellbeing. When something worries you about your child’s nursery, preschool or childminder, you absolutely have the right to raise it....
The Christmas Crunch: How ‘Free’ Childcare Leaves Parents Struggling During the Most Expensive Time of Year
For many families, Christmas is meant to be a season of joy - twinkling lights, excited children, and time together. But for parents relying on so-called ‘free childcare’, December often brings a very different reality: rising costs, stretched finances, and the hard...
Autumn Budget 2025: What is the Next Government Must Fix in Childcare
As the UK heads toward another major election cycle and the next round of budget decisions, one issue keeps rising to the top of national conversations. Childcare. It is often framed as a family issue, yet the reality is far more serious.It is an economic emergency, a...
Is It Still Play? How Quality Is Quietly Slipping Away in Early Years Settings
For years, early years professionals have fought to protect play, to champion it, justify it, and remind the world that it is not “just play,” but the foundation of every child’s social, emotional, and cognitive development. Yet today, we are facing a quieter, more...
Budgeting for the Unspoken: A Parents Guide to the Hidden Costs of ‘Free’ Childcare
If you’ve ever been confused by the term ‘free childcare’, you’re not alone. On the surface, it sounds like an incredible opportunity - a chance to ease financial pressure while giving your child a quality early years experience. But as many parents have discovered,...
SEN and the Funding Gap: When the Children Who Need the Most Get the Least
Inclusion should be more than a word — it’s a promise.A promise that every child, no matter their background or ability, will have access to the education, care, and support they need to thrive. Yet across the UK, this promise is being broken. The reality is...