The UK government funds early years childcare through the Early Years National Funding Formula (EYNFF), which sets hourly funding rates paid to local authorities and then passed to nurseries. These rates vary by age group and area, and they are often presented as the foundation of ‘free childcare’, but they do not cover the full cost of delivering high-quality care.
According to the Department for Education’s funding tables for 2025–26:
• The national AVERAGE hourly funding rate for 3- and 4-year-olds is £6.12. This takes into account the higher rate for London boroughs however – the mean average outside of that area is closer to £4.85
• For two-year-olds, it’s £8.53 per hour (again less in most areas)
• For under-2s, the average rate is £11.54 per hour (again, closer to £9 in areas outside of London)
These figures may look reasonable in isolation, but when you compare them to the real costs of staffing, premises, overheads, consumables, and statutory requirements, the gap is stark.
Official research from the Department for Education’s own provider surveys shows that many settings can’t cover their costs:
• More than half of providers reported that their income did not cover their costs in the 2024–25 early years period.
• In autumn 2024–25 ‘Pulse’ surveys, 48% of group-based providers said funding rates made additional funded places not worthwhile, and many settings reported ongoing staffing shortages and high vacancy times.
This official data clearly shows that funding is not aligned with real market costs – a finding reflected in independent sector research as well.
Below are the significant operational costs that government funding does not fully cover, despite these being essential to running a childcare setting:
1) Leadership and Management
There is no separate funding uplift for setting managers, directors, or leadership time. Every funded hour is calculated on the assumption that staff time contributes to ratios, not to leadership, planning or oversight. Yet leadership is essential for safeguarding, compliance, quality assurance and day-to-day decision-making.
2) Finance and Administration
Government funding doesn’t explicitly cover:
• bookkeeping and payroll
• funding claims
• invoicing and debt management
• reporting to Local Authorities or Ofsted
This administrative burden is often absorbed by managers and practitioners – unpaid or squeezed into hours already dedicated to child contact time.
3) Premises, Safety, Maintenance and Compliance
Funding pays only for ‘care hours’ not
• planned and reactive maintenance of buildings
• fire safety or risk assessments
• health and safety compliance
• upgrades required by regulation changes
Nurseries lease or run buildings that require continual investment – costs that cannot be met by hourly funding alone.
4) Cleaning, Hygiene and Refuse Disposal (Including Nappy & Sanitary Waste)
Cleanliness and waste management are statutory requirements, especially important in early years settings.
Yet funding does not adequately cover:
• daily cleaning
• deep cleaning and infection control
• cleaning materials and equipment
• contracted refuse disposal services
• specialist nappy and sanitary waste disposal
These are recurring, unavoidable costs, and licensed waste disposal (e.g., for nappies and adult sanitary bins) carries its own regulated cost that nurseries must absorb or pass back to parents.
5) Staff Pay, Holidays, Sick Pay and Pensions
The government’s funding rates are meant to contribute toward staffing costs, but they don’t include
• fully funded paid annual leave
• statutory sick pay
• employer pension contributions beyond the minimum
• parity with other early years professions
According to the Early Years Alliance’s sector evidence, 63% of early years staff considering leaving the sector cited low pay and feeling undervalued,
indicating that funding fails to support sustainable careers.
6) Training, CPD and Qualifications
Ongoing training (e.g., child protection, SEND, specialist skills) is mandatory and essential, but funding doesn’t offer separate provision for this, nor does it cover the lost ratio hours when staff train.
7) Learning Resources and Enrichment Activities
Nurseries are inspected on the richness of their curriculum, yet funding covers only baseline care hours, not:
• diverse resources
• specialised teaching materials
• visitors and trips
• creative and sensory resources
These items are typically paid for by parents, because funding simply doesn’t stretch that far.
8) Inclusion and Additional Needs Support
Supporting children with additional needs (SEND) requires:
• one-to-one or additional staff time
• specialist equipment
• tailored training
• liaison with external agencies
Although there is a SEND inclusion fund, it is often limited and inconsistent,
leaving settings to subsidise inclusion themselves.
Even on staffing levels, official surveys raise alarm bells
• The number of registered childcare providers fell by 1% between 2024 and 2025.
• Staff vacancy times remain long,
with many providers advertising roles for several months before filling them.
This reflects a workforce under pressure and supports the conclusion that funded hours alone aren’t enough to maintain a stable, high-quality childcare sector.
Government funding for early years, widely promoted through entitlements like 30 free hours, is a significant policy tool. But official funding tables and provider surveys show that these funded hours are not fully funding the cost of running childcare at the level families and regulators expect.
Funding pays for the hours.
It does not properly fund:
• leadership and management
• core operational costs
• compliance with health and safety
• proper staffing conditions
• professional development
• essential consumables and waste disposal
• real resource-rich learning environments
Until funding reflects the full cost of high-quality early years provision, including all of these hidden or unfunded costs, nurseries will continue to struggle financially, pass costs to parents, or reduce services and quality in response.
Mind The Funding Gap
Mind the Funding Gap You have all been told that your nursery place is ‘free’. But there is a problem and parents need to listen or risk losing their setting’s ability to remain in the scheme. Imagine that the government decides that a burger and chips can only ever...
DfE Complaint
COMPLAINT TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATIONRegarding: Early Years Funding Rate Methodology, Failure of the Public Sector EqualityDuty, and Flawed Evidence Base Submitted by: Early Years Providers — EnglandDate: May 2026 The Rt Hon Bridget Phillipson MPSecretary of State...
‘Have you seen the calibre of people working in daycare?’
There is a small campaign in Australia to defund daycare and give the money to mothers instead. One of the arguments is, “Have you seen the calibre of people working in daycare?” Putting aside the rights and wrongs and practicalities of the argument, this should be a...
Can We Stop Pretending Reggio Emilia Is Accessible to Most Nurseries?
The Princess of Wales and the Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood have once again highlighted the Reggio Emilia approach in the media. And to be clear, Reggio Emilia is beautiful. It’s thoughtful, creative, child-led, inspiring, and deeply respectful of...
Why Is Profit In Childcare Still Seen As Wrong?
A recent airing of Dragon’s Den featured young woman who had suffered from severe ME had used some accupressure ‘ear seeds’ which transformed her health. She started selling them for £30 a set, and the cost to her was £3. The Dragons were hugely impressed at her 900%...
Why We’re Called Free Childcare: The Untold Story
On the surface, our name sounds simple. After all, that’s what the government wanted to portray free childcare in the UK. It sounds like something positive.. Something that should exist in a country that says it backs working families. But the truth behind our name...
Safer Sleep in Nurseries: A Positive Step… But Who Is Paying for It?
We all want the absolute safest environment for our babies. No one is arguing with that. The government has recently tightened safer sleep guidance within the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), and on paper, it’s a positive move. Clearer expectations. Stronger...
Sweden Went Digital and Now They’re Going Back
For years, Sweden was seen as a pioneer in education. Classrooms filled with tablets instead of textbooks, screens replacing paper, and a bold shift toward fully digital learning from the earliest years. It looked like the future - modern, efficient, and perfectly...
“This Is How It Starts”: What the France Nursery Scandal warns us about the UK’s childcare system
Across France, something deeply uncomfortable is being exposed. Not just individual cases of harm, but patterns. Children as young as three, attending école maternelle (state nursery schools), have come forward describing experiences that range from sexual abuse to...
Questions to Ask Your Local School-Based Nursery (Before You Decide)
Choosing a nursery is a big decision. And with the rise of school-based nurseries, many parents are being told this is the “best start” for their child. But the reality is, not all settings are the same. And not all environments will suit every child. So before making...
This is one of the most comprehensive summaries of the funding situation I have read. A concern that may not have been addressed is the cost of staff sickness, which companies have to pay for, in addition to finding cover to ensure ratio compliance, and this is certainly not covered by the funding. PPE equipment is not required for nappy changes (optional), and such costs cannot be charged to consumables. The funding is stifling the Early Years Economy with all the restrictions upon settings if they choose to accept this; if they don’t, parents lose out on a child’s allocation of funding. Equally, each setting has its own set of expenses relative to location, building, and business rates. For example, the setting is housed in a regency house of interest, a conservation area, a large garden area, high business rates, which bring a set of higher additional costs, and whilst a business choice, families choose us for this, all settings receive the same amount and are told they can’t charge for anything other than the limited consumables. So, to put this into perspective, a church hall running a playgroup receives the same amount of funding, yet costs are clearly more variable, and the consumable charge is the same for all. This makes no sense, and I am unaware of any other private industry governed by such restrictions. It certainly didn’t work in the dentistry industry.
This is one of the most comprehensive summaries of the funding situation I have read. A concern that may not have been addressed is the cost of staff sickness, which companies have to pay for, in addition to finding cover to ensure ratio compliance, and this is certainly not covered by the funding. PPE equipment is not required for nappy changes (optional), and such costs cannot be charged to consumables. The funding is stifling the Early Years Economy with all the restrictions upon settings if they choose to accept this; if they don’t, parents lose out on a child’s allocation of funding. Equally, each setting has its own set of expenses relative to location, building, and business rates. For example, the setting is housed in a regency house of interest, a conservation area, a large garden area, high business rates, which bring a set of higher additional costs, and whilst a business choice, families choose us for this, all settings receive the same amount and are told they can’t charge for anything other than the limited consumables. So, to put this into perspective, a village hall running a playgroup receives the same amount of funding, yet costs are clearly more variable, and the consumable charge is the same for all. This makes no sense, and I am unaware of any other private industry governed by such restrictions. It certainly didn’t work in the dentistry industry.