The government’s push for early years providers to itemise invoices is presented as a move towards transparency and parental choice. In practice, it risks undermining how nurseries actually function.

Nursery fees are not a collection of optional extras. They are the result of long-term planning around staffing, ratios, training, premises, resources, compliance and curriculum delivery. The offer exists as a whole. Asking parents to ‘pick and choose’ from an invoice ignores the reality that early years provision is an interdependent system, not a menu.

Childcare is not retail. You cannot remove meals without affecting routines and safeguarding. You cannot opt out of consumables without limiting learning opportunities. You cannot separate ‘care’ from ‘education’ without fundamentally misunderstanding the Early Years Foundation Stage, where learning is embedded in every interaction, routine and experience.

Itemisation also raises a deeper problem: how do you meaningfully separate and price pedagogy?
The level of education and care a child receives is shaped by qualified staff, reflective practice, planning time, observations, supervision, training, and the intentional use of play-based pedagogies. These are not add-ons. They are the core of quality. Reducing them to line items risks flattening professional practice into something transactional, rather than relational and developmental.

Itemised invoices create the illusion of choice. When parents question charges for extra curricular activities such as dance or yoga, trips or forest school experience, the implication is that these costs could simply be removed. They cannot. The cost either shifts to the provider, already operating on unsustainable margins, other parents effectively subsidise those children whose parents do not wish to ‘opt in’, or quality is eroded through the removal of additional extras for all.

What follows is not empowerment but friction. Providers spend more time justifying non-negotiable costs, while parents are led to suspect overcharging rather than chronic underfunding.

At the same time, government continues to underfund ‘free’ entitlement hours, knowing providers must charge elsewhere to survive. Itemisation becomes a trap: charge inclusively and be accused of opacity, or itemise and invite constant dispute.

Parents deserve clarity. But clarity does not have to mean itemisation.

A clear explanation of what nursery fees include, and why they must be offered as a complete, professionally designed package, respects both families and providers. True transparency would also mean government honesty about what childcare actually costs.

Early years is not failing because nurseries won’t itemise.
It is failing because the system refuses to fund quality care and education properly.

And no line-by-line invoice will change that.

Underfunding childcare is not just a policy choice; it is a decision that directly harms the workforce delivering it.

I have been following someone called ‘The Nursery Survivor’ on Instagram. The account is run by an ex-nursery worker who clearly had some terrible experiences working in nurseries. The short videos are funny and sometimes excruciatingly accurate. She portrays life in...

An open letter to parents about “Free” Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)

Dear parents, We are writing to explain what is happening behind the scenes in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) right now, and why many nurseries are deeply worried about the future of ECEC places and whether early years education and childcare  will still...