Latest press

Debunking - TOT-AL RIP OFF Nurseries BANNED from charging parents sneaky ‘top-up’ fees for rent, bills and toys in government crackdown

Article Link: https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/38157999/nurseries-banned-charging-sneaky-fees-rent-bills-toys/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=sunmoneyfacebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwdGRjcAP2dnBleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeVQosB_1j5C0W5J3ZfCLHysuDS-HRkdBiAHKZ_emIbMxtkkMhR95lPMO8G1U_aem_TEk-nCMeoFsWcZyFr1NopQ#Echobox=1770589966

“Sneaky fees” is loaded language

The article uses emotive wording such as “sneaky” and “forcing parents” — framing standard operational costs as dishonest behaviour.

In reality, government funding does not cover the full cost of delivering high-quality early years education. Independent research consistently shows a shortfall per child per hour.

Settings are left with two choices:

  • Operate at a loss

  • Or charge for services and extras that fall outside the funded entitlement

That is not deception — it is survival.

 The funding gap is the real issue

The funded hours are not fully funded.

The hourly rate many nurseries receive does not:

  • Cover staffing at required ratios

  • Reflect rising wage costs

  • Account for rent, utilities, insurance, food, or resources

  • Cover SEND provision properly

When the media frames additional charges as exploitation, it ignores the structural funding shortfall at the heart of the problem.

Nurseries are not profiting — many are closing

If providers were profiting from “extras,” we would not be seeing:

  • Record nursery closures

  • Reduced session availability

  • Providers opting out of the scheme

  • Staff leaving the sector

The sector is under strain — not generating windfall profits.

Transparency vs. misrepresentation

Most nurseries clearly outline:

  • What is included in funded hours

  • What optional extras cost

  • What is required to remain sustainable

Transparency is standard practice. The narrative that providers are secretly adding charges distorts how the system actually works.

The Bigger Picture

This type of coverage shifts attention away from the real question:

Why is the government promoting “free childcare” while underfunding its delivery?

Blaming nurseries distracts from the policy gap.

 

 

Debunking: CHILD SCARE I’ll never send my kid to nursery after working in them – toxic staff, babies in soiled nappies & tots forgotten OUTSIDE

article link and image source : https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/38145886/mum-sending-kid-nursery-debate/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=sunmainfacebook&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1770470390

“I’ll never send my kid to nursery – toxic staff, babies in soiled nappies & tots forgotten outside”

Article summary:
The piece presents serious allegations from an individual describing poor practice and safeguarding concerns within nurseries.

Our Response

Safeguarding concerns must always be taken seriously

If a child is left in a soiled nappy or forgotten outside, that is a safeguarding failure.

Those situations should be reported and investigated immediately. No child should ever be placed at risk.

However, one account — however upsetting — does not represent the thousands of early years settings operating safely every day.

Context matters

Early years settings operate under strict regulation, inspection, and safeguarding frameworks.

The vast majority of providers:

  • Meet statutory requirements

  • Pass inspections

  • Employ trained, caring professionals

  • Work tirelessly to provide safe environments

Sensational headlines can create fear without reflecting the broader reality.

We must ask why workforce strain is rising

Where staffing feels “toxic” or stretched, we have to look at the structural pressures:

  • Chronic underfunding of funded hours

  • Rising wage costs

  • Recruitment and retention crisis

  • Increasing demand without matching investment

  • Growing SEND needs without adequate support

When funding does not cover the true cost of delivery, settings are forced to:

  • Stretch staffing

  • Operate on minimal margins

  • Carry financial and emotional strain

That pressure impacts morale and sustainability.

Underfunding creates risk

This does not excuse poor practice.

But a chronically underfunded system increases the risk of:

  • Staff burnout

  • High turnover

  • Reduced continuity of care

  • Lower morale

  • Fewer experienced practitioners remaining in the sector

If government policy expands “free childcare” without fully funding it, the strain intensifies.

The Bigger Picture

Parents deserve both:

  • Safe, high-quality childcare

  • Honest reporting about what is happening in the sector

If we want consistent quality and safeguarding, the solution is not fear-based headlines.

It is proper, sustainable funding of early years provision.

Debunking - The Prime Minister's Letter to Parents and Carers On The Best Start In Life
4th September 2025  – Gov.co.ukfree childcare letter from the Prime Minister
  • “We are making Family Life easier too, with hundreds of school-based nursery places opening this September, and thousands more to come”
  • “Supporting families is at the heart of our plan for change.”
  • There wasn’t any need for change. The government has crippled the early years and education sectors through a lack of valuing the people in these sectors. The government should be listening to the sector rather than making new policies. The sector has all the answers, the government just doesn’t listen.
  • “Nothing will stop me in my mission to back families like yours through Plan for Change, to build a better future for you, for your children, and for Britain”. Translates to “Nothing will stop our agenda to ensure we can control and monitor your children from birth.” School environments do not develop free thinking, creativity, and so much more.

 

 

Debunking - Childcare expansion 'could leave parents paying more'
1st of September 2025 – BBCfree childcare hidden fees

  • Funding gap: Government subsidies often fail to cover the full cost of providing childcare, leaving providers to increase fees for parents to make up the shortfall.

  • Staff shortages: Expansion requires more qualified childcare workers, but with low wages and recruitment challenges, nurseries may raise costs to attract and retain staff.

  • Higher operational costs: More children mean increased demand for facilities, resources, and utilities, which drives up running costs that get passed on to parents.

  • Limited availability: Not all nurseries can expand capacity, so high demand for limited spaces may push prices up.

  • Exclusions and restrictions: Free hours may not cover meals, activities, or extra care (before/after hours), meaning parents still face rising additional charges.

  • Regional disparities: In some areas, especially where childcare is already stretched, parents may face significantly higher costs than the government’s national savings estimates suggest.

  • Inflationary pressures: Rising costs of living (energy, food, rent) hit nurseries hard, leading to inevitable increases in fees regardless of funding.

  • Hidden costs: Parents may have to pay more for extras such as trips, nappies, snacks, or mandatory contributions, which can outweigh the savings from funded hours.

 

NEWS ON THE CHILDCARE CRISIS

small child playing with building blocks

Free childcare crisis as surge in demand leaves Labour with funding black hole:

The Independent – Ministers have been warned the childcare sector is at risk of “collapse” after a boom in demand left a government-funded scheme in a £1 billion funding shortfall. Experts say the unmet gap threatens the sustainability of providers across the country.

Read The Full Story →

sad child left out<br />

Nursery rebellion as they limit free places over funding shortfalls

Nearly 60% of UK nurseries are considering cutting the number of government-funded places due to rising costs and insufficient funding. Some settings may even prioritize fee-paying children or close completely unless immediate support arrives

Read The Full Story →

sad child left out<br />

Nursery closures likely to be on table if proposed Reform UK funding cut goes ahead

Plans that could see Reform UK cut funding to nurseries in central Lancashire will see job losses, closures and fewer funded spaces for children in deprived areas.

Read The Full Story →

sad child left out<br />

Nursery owner challenges Education Secretary over funding for free childcare

Nursery owner from Peterborough, Gordon, challenges Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson over funding for free childcare.

Read The Full Story →

sad child left out<br />

Childminders ignored in Labour’s nursery expansion – a looming childcare crisis

Keir Starmer and Bridget Phillipson have promised thousands of new nursery places from September 2025 as part of the first wave of 300 school-based nurseries.

Read The Full Story →

sad child left out<br />

Campaigners call for ‘fairer funding model’ to halt nursery closures

Early years campaigners are calling on the government to put in place a “fairer funding model” for providers to offer the government’s expansion of free childcare hours. 
Read The Full Story →

Blog

Two Tiers of Nursery Inspection? Why Parents Should Be Asking Hard Questions About School-Based Nurseries

by | Feb 16, 2026 | , , , , , ,

The Government’s rapid expansion of school-based nurseries is being framed as a solution to the childcare crisis - more places, more convenience and more support for working families. For many parents, that sounds like a long-awaited step forward. But beneath the...

read more